People ex rel. Goodman v. Wallack

23 A.D.2d 514, 256 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5081
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 A.D.2d 514 (People ex rel. Goodman v. Wallack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Goodman v. Wallack, 23 A.D.2d 514, 256 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Aulisi, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus. The issue of the voluntariness of a confession cannot be entertained in a habeas corpus proceeding. The remedy is by way of application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis to the trial court (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72). We find no merit to appellant’s other contentions (see People v. Goodman, 16 A D 2d 988, cert. den. Oct. 23, 1962 [Van Voorhis, J.], cert. den. 373 U. S. 926). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
702 F. Supp. 1082 (D. Delaware, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.2d 514, 256 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-goodman-v-wallack-nyappdiv-1965.