People ex rel. Gonzalez v. New York State Division of Parole

255 A.D.2d 611, 682 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12829
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), entered August 5, 1996, which refused an application for an order to show cause in lieu of the writ.

[612]*612Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The petitioner has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Gonzalez v. New York State Division of Parole, 255 A.D.2d 611, 682 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 611 (People ex rel. Gonzalez v. New York State Division of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Tse v. Barometre
2020 NY Slip Op 06280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People ex rel. Fishon v. Artuz
264 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)