People Ex Rel. Goldschmidt v. . Travis
114 N.E. 1078, 219 N.Y. 589, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 918
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Hiscook, Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and Cardozo,. JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People Ex Rel. Goldschmidt v. . Travis, 114 N.E. 1078, 219 N.Y. 589, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 918 (N.Y. 1916).
114 N.E. 1078 (People Ex Rel. Goldschmidt v. . Travis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals
270 U.S. 117 (Supreme Court, 1926)