People ex rel. Goldberg v. Regenteen Dress Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Goldberg v. Regenteen Dress Corp.

243 A.D. 781

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

The petitioner asked for a peremptory order of mandamus directing the appellant to permit the petitioner to examine, inspect and make excerpts from its stock books, books of account, documents and records. The petition was granted and the appeal is from the order entered thereon. Peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law, without costs, and an alternative order directed to issue, in the exercise of discretion, and the matter remitted to Special Term for a determination of the issues concerning the ownership of the capital stock of the respondent, appellant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner asked for a peremptory order of mandamus directing the appellant to permit the petitioner to examine, inspect and make excerpts from its stock books, books of account, documents and records. The petition was granted and the appeal is from the order entered thereon. Peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law, without costs, and an alternative order directed to issue, in the exercise of discretion, and the matter remitted to Special Term for a determination of the issues concerning the ownership of the capital stock of the respondent, appellant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Goldberg v. Regenteen Dress Corp., 243 A.D. 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 781 (People ex rel. Goldberg v. Regenteen Dress Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.