People ex rel. Goins v. District Attorney

5 A.D.3d 616, 772 N.Y.S.2d 846, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2695

This text of 5 A.D.3d 616 (People ex rel. Goins v. District Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Goins v. District Attorney, 5 A.D.3d 616, 772 N.Y.S.2d 846, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), dated July 26, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The petitioner has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se supplemental brief. Santucci, J.E, Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 616, 772 N.Y.S.2d 846, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-goins-v-district-attorney-nyappdiv-2004.