People ex rel. Goetting v. Schnitzer

71 N.Y.S. 320
CourtNew York County Courts
DecidedMarch 2, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 71 N.Y.S. 320 (People ex rel. Goetting v. Schnitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Goetting v. Schnitzer, 71 N.Y.S. 320 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Opinion

HURD, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the magistrate has found that the defendant willfully abandoned his wife. The case cited by the appellant (People v. Cullen, 153 N. Y. 629, 47 N. E. 894) is not in point. In that case a separation had been effected by a decree in an action by the wife. There is no separation, but an abandonment, in this case. The suit in which the order for alimony was obtained was the husband's suit, and it is still pending. The mere pendency of the suit cannot oust the magistrate of jurisdiction, for it may not succeed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Aulbach
168 Misc. 234 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1938)
People ex rel. Ford v. Ford
124 Misc. 19 (New York County Courts, 1924)
Kingsbury v. Sternberg
178 A.D. 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 N.Y.S. 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-goetting-v-schnitzer-nycountyct-1901.