People ex rel. Glasier v. Glasier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Glasier v. Glasier

2 A.D.2d 793, 154 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4673

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 793 (People ex rel. Glasier v. Glasier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Glasier v. Glasier, 2 A.D.2d 793, 154 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for a stay pending the determination of an appeal. Motion granted providing appellant files a record on appeal pursuant to rule 22, files five typewritten copies of his [794]*794brief, and serves one typewritten copy of his brief on respondent on or before July 18, 1956 and is ready for argument on July 24, 1956 at 1 o’clock, p.m. In the event appellant fails to meet any of the conditions set forth, the motion is denied. Respondent may submit typewritten copies of her brief upon the argument of the appeal. Directions will be given later for replacement of the typewritten briefs with briefs which conform with the applicable rules. Present — Bergan, J. P., Coon, Halpern, Zeller and Gibson, J J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for a stay pending the determination of an appeal. Motion granted providing appellant files a record on appeal pursuant to rule 22, files five typewritten copies of his [794]*794brief, and serves one typewritten copy of his brief on respondent on or before July 18, 1956 and is ready for argument on July 24, 1956 at 1 o’clock, p.m. In the event appellant fails to meet any of the conditions set forth, the motion is denied. Respondent may submit typewritten copies of her brief upon the argument of the appeal. Directions will be given later for replacement of the typewritten briefs with briefs which conform with the applicable rules. Present — Bergan, J. P., Coon, Halpern, Zeller and Gibson, J J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 793, 154 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-glasier-v-glasier-nyappdiv-1956.