People ex rel. Galante v. Jackson
This text of 268 A.D. 940 (People ex rel. Galante v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the County Court of Clinton County at a Special Term dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. There is nothing in the record or otherwise to justify a presumption that relator’s sentence for petit larceny and his sentence for assault, second degree, should have been served concurrently. Relator’s other claim that time spent on parole, after his first release on parole, should have been deducted from the remainder of the maximum sentence he was required to serve is not sustained by statutory authority. (People ex rel. Dayes v. Morhous, 267 App. Div. 851.) Order of dismissal affirmed, without costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 940, 51 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-galante-v-jackson-nyappdiv-1944.