People ex rel. Fulton v. O'Ryan

205 P. 949, 71 Colo. 250
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 3, 1922·No. No. 10,144·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding in mandamus in the district court by Fulton, claiming under the civil service law, as secretary of the State Board of Charities and Corrections, to compel the board to pay her as such.

The district court denied the mandamus; we reversed that decision on error. The plaintiff in error now asks judgment for costs. The rule seems to be that no costs can be recovered against a public officer prosecuting or defending as such in good faith. Houston v. The Neuse River Navigation Co., 53 N. C. 476; Scrafford v. Gladwin County Supervisors, 42 Mich. 464, 4 N. W. 167; O’Connor v. Walsh, 83 N. Y. App. Div. 179, 82 N. Y. Supp. 499.

Motion denied.

Mr. Chief Justice Scott and Mr. Justice Burke not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Fulton v. O'Ryan, 205 P. 949, 71 Colo. 250 (Colo. 1922).

205 P. 949 (People ex rel. Fulton v. O'Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Colorado Springs v. Street
254 P. 440 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1927)
Dietemann v. People Ex Rel. Blackman
239 P. 1020 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1925)
Stong v. Milliken
233 P. 154 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1925)