People ex rel. Fulmer v. Scully
This text of 110 A.D.2d 671 (People ex rel. Fulmer v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[672]*672Respondent violated 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 by failing to commence a superintendent’s hearing within seven days of petitioner’s initial confinement to his cell. Moreover, petitioner’s due process rights were violated by respondent’s failure to provide him with a transcript of the superintendent’s hearing (see, Matter of Crudo v Fogg, 69 AD2d 902; Matter of Hurley v Ward, 61 AD2d 881; Matter of Walls v Scully, 121 Misc 2d 698; Matter of Lozada v Scully, 108 AD2d 859). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D.2d 671, 487 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-fulmer-v-scully-nyappdiv-1985.