People ex rel. Fulmer v. Scully
110 A.D.2d 671, 487 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48568
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1985·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
[672] Respondent violated 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 by failing to commence a superintendent’s hearing within seven days of petitioner’s initial confinement to his cell. Moreover, petitioner’s due process rights were violated by respondent’s failure to provide him with a transcript of the superintendent’s hearing (see, Matter of Crudo v Fogg, 69 AD2d 902; Matter of Hurley v Ward, 61 AD2d 881; Matter of Walls v Scully, 121 Misc 2d 698; Matter of Lozada v Scully, 108 AD2d 859). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Fulmer v. Scully, 110 A.D.2d 671, 487 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 671 (People ex rel. Fulmer v. Scully) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Scully
156 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Wysinger v. Scully
150 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Hawkins v. Scully
146 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Brito v. Sullivan
141 A.D.2d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Jackson v. Coughlin
129 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)