People ex rel. Fuentes v. La Vallee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Fuentes v. La Vallee

40 A.D.2d 758, 338 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3654

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 758 (People ex rel. Fuentes v. La Vallee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Fuentes v. La Vallee, 40 A.D.2d 758, 338 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Relator appeals from a denial of his application for a writ of habeas, corpus. Special Term gave as its reasons “ that the petition failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR, Section 7002 (e) 1. and 6.” Among other deficiencies in the petition was the absence of any reference to other applications made by petitioner since his conviction on April 15, 1955. The official reports indicate that petitioner has resorted to various proceedings since his conviction. The court recited in the narrative part of its order that the petition “ is without merit ”. Inasmuch as the application was denied arid there was no hearing, the substantive merits of petitioner’s application were not considered. The denial, therefore, was without prejudice to the institution of a proper proceeding if petitioner is so advised. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court denying application for writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Relator appeals from a denial of his application for a writ of habeas, corpus. Special Term gave as its reasons “ that the petition failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR, Section 7002 (e) 1. and 6.” Among other deficiencies in the petition was the absence of any reference to other applications made by petitioner since his conviction on April 15, 1955. The official reports indicate that petitioner has resorted to various proceedings since his conviction. The court recited in the narrative part of its order that the petition “ is without merit ”. Inasmuch as the application was denied arid there was no hearing, the substantive merits of petitioner’s application were not considered. The denial, therefore, was without prejudice to the institution of a proper proceeding if petitioner is so advised. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court denying application for writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 758, 338 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-fuentes-v-la-vallee-nyappdiv-1972.