People ex rel. Fryson v. Fay

27 A.D.2d 749, 277 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4828

This text of 27 A.D.2d 749 (People ex rel. Fryson v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Fryson v. Fay, 27 A.D.2d 749, 277 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 19, 1965, reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the court below for the purpose of: (1) holding a further hearing, (2) assigning counsel to represent relator on such hearing and (3) making a determination de novo on the basis of the proof adduced upon such hearing. No questions of fact were considered. It was error for the court below to have disregarded relator’s request that he be assigned counsel to represent him (see People v. Hughes, 15 N Y 2d 172). Uglietta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.2d 749, 277 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-fryson-v-fay-nyappdiv-1967.