People ex rel. Freeman v. McMann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Freeman v. McMann

27 A.D.2d 964, 279 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4332

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 964 (People ex rel. Freeman v. McMann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Freeman v. McMann, 27 A.D.2d 964, 279 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, denying relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Relator contends that a prior 10 to 30-year sentence imposed upon him in 1936 was rendered void because the Parole Board delivered him, while he was being detained on a parole violation warrant, to the New York City authorities whereupon he was subsequently tried, convicted and sentenced to a year imprisonment for a crime committed while on parole. We agree with Special Term that People ex rel. Rainone v. Murphy (1 N Y 2d 367) does not mandate the voiding of an originally valid sentence on the basis of the Parole Board’s action herein. Coneededly, relator has been credited on the instant sentence with the time served under the New York City conviction and, accordingly, the judgment below must [965]*965be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, denying relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Relator contends that a prior 10 to 30-year sentence imposed upon him in 1936 was rendered void because the Parole Board delivered him, while he was being detained on a parole violation warrant, to the New York City authorities whereupon he was subsequently tried, convicted and sentenced to a year imprisonment for a crime committed while on parole. We agree with Special Term that People ex rel. Rainone v. Murphy (1 N Y 2d 367) does not mandate the voiding of an originally valid sentence on the basis of the Parole Board’s action herein. Coneededly, relator has been credited on the instant sentence with the time served under the New York City conviction and, accordingly, the judgment below must [965]*965be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 964, 279 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-freeman-v-mcmann-nyappdiv-1967.