People ex rel. Frazier v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

133 N.E. 350, 300 Ill. 556
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 22, 1921
DocketNo. 14187
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 N.E. 350 (People ex rel. Frazier v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Frazier v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co., 133 N.E. 350, 300 Ill. 556 (Ill. 1921).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court:

The question presented in this case is the identical question presented in the objection to the school tax in People v. Payne, 296 Ill. 483. Appellant contends that the decision rendered in that case was due to a misconception of the provisions of the statutes involved and urges that the decision be overruled. We have considered its argument on the question and adhere to the former decision.

The judgment of the county court of White county is therefore affirmed. ,

, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education of School District No. 41 v. Wagemann
163 N.E. 314 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 N.E. 350, 300 Ill. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-frazier-v-cleveland-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-ill-1921.