People ex rel. Francis v. Brann

2019 NY Slip Op 2440
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 28, 2019
Docket2019-02419
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2440 (People ex rel. Francis v. Brann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Francis v. Brann, 2019 NY Slip Op 2440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People ex rel. Francis v Brann (2019 NY Slip Op 02440)
People ex rel. Francis v Brann
2019 NY Slip Op 02440
Decided on March 28, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 28, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
ROBERT J. MILLER
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2019-02419

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Grover Francis, on behalf of Taalib Baxter, petitioner,

v

Cynthia Brann, Commissioner, Department of Correction, or any other person having custody of Taalib Baxter, respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, Staten Island, NY (Grover Francis pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Alexander Fumelli of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application, inter alia, to release the detainee, Taalib Baxter, upon his posting of an insurance company bail bond in the sum of $50,000.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"At a bail bond source hearing held pursuant to CPL 520.30, the petitioner has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the cash or collateral posted to secure a bail bond originates from a legitimate source and is not the fruit of criminal or unlawful conduct" (People ex rel. Aidala v Warden, Rikers Is. Corr. Facility, 100 AD3d 667, 667; see People v Esquivel, 158 Misc 2d 720; see also People ex rel. Savage v Horn, 56 AD3d 806). Under the circumstances presented here, the petitioner failed to meet his burden at the bail bond source hearing.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

BALKIN, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Esquivel
158 Misc. 2d 720 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-francis-v-brann-nyappdiv-2019.