People Ex Rel. Fox Ex Rel. Martinez-Jacquez v. Ponte
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4571 (People Ex Rel. Fox Ex Rel. Martinez-Jacquez v. Ponte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), entered on or about September 8, 2016, denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 70, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.
This challenge to a bail court’s refusal, on the ground of insufficient collateral, to approve a bail bond is moot because the bail court has entered a subsequent order that increased the amount of bail, and rendered the prior bond inapplicable. We do not find that an exception to the mootness doctrine should apply (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Furthermore, because the existence of the superseding order would make it impossible to grant petitioner immediate release, habeas corpus relief would not be available (see People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901 [1980]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 4571, 151 A.D.3d 502, 53 N.Y.S.3d 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-fox-ex-rel-martinez-jacquez-v-ponte-nyappdiv-2017.