People ex rel. Forrester v. Sheriff

114 A.D. 861, 20 N.Y. Crim. 334, 100 N.Y.S. 193, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2213
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 24, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 A.D. 861 (People ex rel. Forrester v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Forrester v. Sheriff, 114 A.D. 861, 20 N.Y. Crim. 334, 100 N.Y.S. 193, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

Section 658 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that if a defendant in confinement under an indictment appears to be “insane” the court may appoint a commission to examine him and report to the court “ as to his sanity.” The next section provides [862]*862that if the commission find the defendant “insane” the trial must be suspended until he becomes sane, and the court, if it deem his discharge dangerous to the public peace or safety, must commit him to a State lunatic asylum until he become sane.

The jurisdiction of the court to commit the defendant to a lunatic asylum is thus made to depend on the commission reporting him insane. This the commission did not do. Instead of plainly reporting that the defendant was insane or not it wrote what it calls an opinion per curiam,” which leaves the matter referred to them in a state of confusion.

The order should be reversed and the defendant discharged from the lunatic asylum and delivered over to the custody and confinement whence he came.

Woodward, Jenks and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant discharged from the lunatic asylum and delivered over to the custody and confinement whence he came.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Nyhan
37 N.Y. Crim. 74 (New York Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A.D. 861, 20 N.Y. Crim. 334, 100 N.Y.S. 193, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-forrester-v-sheriff-nyappdiv-1906.