People ex rel. Ford v. Kendall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Ford v. Kendall

27 A.D.2d 970, 282 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4346

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 970 (People ex rel. Ford v. Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Ford v. Kendall, 27 A.D.2d 970, 282 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Herlihy, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment dated August

31, 1966 which sustained a writ of habeas corpus and ordered relator’s discharge from an institution under the control of the Department of Correction, directing his return to the New Hampton State Training School under the jurisdiction of the Department of Social Welfare. Since the argument of the appeal, there has been submitted to the court a stipulation dated March 17, 1967 by and between the attorneys to the effect that the relator Perry Ford was paroled on September 30, 1966 and “ is presently living at home ”. In view of the stipulation, the appeal should be dismissed as moot and under the circumstances, we [971]*971do not reach or consider the merits. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J. P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herlihy, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment dated August

31, 1966 which sustained a writ of habeas corpus and ordered relator’s discharge from an institution under the control of the Department of Correction, directing his return to the New Hampton State Training School under the jurisdiction of the Department of Social Welfare. Since the argument of the appeal, there has been submitted to the court a stipulation dated March 17, 1967 by and between the attorneys to the effect that the relator Perry Ford was paroled on September 30, 1966 and “ is presently living at home ”. In view of the stipulation, the appeal should be dismissed as moot and under the circumstances, we [971]*971do not reach or consider the merits. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J. P.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 970, 282 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-ford-v-kendall-nyappdiv-1967.