People Ex Rel. Fong v. Honeck
This text of 171 N.E. 771 (People Ex Rel. Fong v. Honeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In each proceeding order of the Appellate Division reversed and those of the Special Term affirmed, without costs, on the ground that the relator has not conclusively *537 established that he was not present in the demanding State at the time of the commission of the crime (People ex rel. Gottschalk v. Brown, 237 N. Y. 483, 486; Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police, 245 U. S. 128); no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 N.E. 771, 253 N.Y. 536, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-fong-v-honeck-ny-1930.