People ex rel. Folsom v. Lawes
This text of 246 A.D. 766 (People ex rel. Folsom v. Lawes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing writ of habeas corpus affirmed. Ho opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs in the result. He is, however, of opinion that the relator is entitled to have determined at this time the legality of the additional sentence of not less than five nor more than ten years, imposed under the provisions of section 1944 of the Penal Law, and that the proper procedure is by way of an application for an order of mandamus. (People ex rel. Sloane v. Lawes, 255 N. Y. 112.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-folsom-v-lawes-nyappdiv-1935.