People ex rel. Flores v. Miller
This text of 201 A.D.2d 820 (People ex rel. Flores v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Canfield, J.), entered June 25, 1993 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.
We affirm. Even aside from the apparent procedural difficul[821]*821ties with the application discussed by Supreme Court, petitioner has not demonstrated a right to relief on the merits. It is well settled that habeas corpus relief is not a proper remedy where the allegations in the petition could have been raised either on direct appeal or by way of a CPL article 440 motion. In the absence of proof warranting a departure from traditional orderly procedure, petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed.
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 A.D.2d 820, 609 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-flores-v-miller-nyappdiv-1994.