People ex rel. Flores v. Miller

201 A.D.2d 820, 609 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1153
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Canfield, J.), entered June 25, 1993 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

We affirm. Even aside from the apparent procedural difficul[821]*821ties with the application discussed by Supreme Court, petitioner has not demonstrated a right to relief on the merits. It is well settled that habeas corpus relief is not a proper remedy where the allegations in the petition could have been raised either on direct appeal or by way of a CPL article 440 motion. In the absence of proof warranting a departure from traditional orderly procedure, petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Flores v. Miller, 201 A.D.2d 820, 609 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 820 (People ex rel. Flores v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Moore v. Miller
244 A.D.2d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)