People Ex Rel. Floersheimer v. . Purdy

New York Court of Appeals

People Ex Rel. Floersheimer v. . Purdy

116 N.E. 890, 221 N.Y. 483, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1329

DecidedMay 8, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 116 N.E. 890 (People Ex Rel. Floersheimer v. . Purdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People Ex Rel. Floersheimer v. . Purdy, 116 N.E. 890, 221 N.Y. 483, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1329 (N.Y. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On authority of 1914 proceeding, herewith decided, the order of the Appellate Division appealed from in this proceeding should be reversed, with costs, to appellant in the Appellate Division and in this court, and the order of the Special Term affirmed.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ., concur; Chase and Hogan, JJ., concur in result.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On authority of 1914 proceeding, herewith decided, the order of the Appellate Division appealed from in this proceeding should be reversed, with costs, to appellant in the Appellate Division and in this court, and the order of the Special Term affirmed.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ., concur; Chase and Hogan, JJ., concur in result.

Order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 N.E. 890, 221 N.Y. 483, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-floersheimer-v-purdy-ny-1917.