People ex rel. Fletcher v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Fletcher v. Travis

19 A.D.3d 1097, 796 N.Y.S.2d 272, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6439

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 1097 (People ex rel. Fletcher v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Fletcher v. Travis, 19 A.D.3d 1097, 796 N.Y.S.2d 272, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Peter E. Corning, A.J.), entered July 16, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the peti[1098]*1098tion seeking a writ of habeas corpus. Contrary to the contention of petitioner, the determination that he violated the terms of his parole is supported by substantial evidence (see People ex rel. Sanchez v Herbert, 2 AD3d 1352 [2003]). We further reject the contention of petitioner that the parole warrant was improperly issued by his parole officer (see 9 NYCRR 8004.2 [a]). Present— Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Martoche and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Peter E. Corning, A.J.), entered July 16, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the peti[1098]*1098tion seeking a writ of habeas corpus. Contrary to the contention of petitioner, the determination that he violated the terms of his parole is supported by substantial evidence (see People ex rel. Sanchez v Herbert, 2 AD3d 1352 [2003]). We further reject the contention of petitioner that the parole warrant was improperly issued by his parole officer (see 9 NYCRR 8004.2 [a]). Present— Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Martoche and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 1097, 796 N.Y.S.2d 272, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-fletcher-v-travis-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack