People ex rel. Fletcher v. Kalamazoo Circuit Judge
39 Mich. 301
Opinion
The statute (Comp. L., § 7110) allowing a fine for not observing a writ of mandamus only applies when a writ has actually issued and been disobeyed. Failure to make return to an order to show cause does not come within the statute. Where a peremptory writ issues it is res judicata. But an order to show cause determines nothing and furnishes no means to measure damages for disobedience, and such disobedience must be punished by the usual remedies and not under the statute.
->
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Fletcher v. Kalamazoo Circuit Judge, 39 Mich. 301 (Mich. 1878).
39 Mich. 301 (People ex rel. Fletcher v. Kalamazoo Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Brooks v. Crains
263 S.W.2d 368 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1953)
Potter v. Common Council
26 N.W. 208 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
Township of Roscommon v. Board of Supervisors
13 N.W. 814 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1882)