People Ex Rel. Fitzgerald v. Casscles

271 N.E.2d 233, 28 N.Y.2d 866, 322 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1326
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 12, 1971·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed on the sole ground that the relator is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus since the relief requested would not result in his discharge from prison. (See, e.g., People ex rel. Dellavalle v. McGinnis, 21 N Y 2d 795; People ex rel. Reynolds v. Martin, 3 N Y 2d 217, 223.) The affirmance is, however, without prejudice to the relator’s institution of an appropriate proceeding to have the court ascertain the time he spent in “ custody ” at Kings Park Hospital and have it credit such time toward his sentence.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Hibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People Ex Rel. Fitzgerald v. Casscles, 271 N.E.2d 233, 28 N.Y.2d 866, 322 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1326 (N.Y. 1971).

271 N.E.2d 233 (People Ex Rel. Fitzgerald v. Casscles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Hatzman v. Kuhlmann
191 A.D.2d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People Ex Rel. Mendolia v. SUPERINTENDENT, GREEN HAVEN CORR. FACILITY
391 N.E.2d 1013 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People ex rel. Yusuf Abdul Alim v. Smith
57 A.D.2d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)