People Ex Rel. First of Englewood Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. Jarecki

192 N.E. 419, 357 Ill. 475, 1934 Ill. LEXIS 761
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 20, 1934
DocketNo. 22399. Writ awarded.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 192 N.E. 419 (People Ex Rel. First of Englewood Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. Jarecki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. First of Englewood Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. Jarecki, 192 N.E. 419, 357 Ill. 475, 1934 Ill. LEXIS 761 (Ill. 1934).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Farthing

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an original petition for mandamus filed by leave of this court. The prayer of the petition is that the writ issue and that the respondent, as judge of the county court of Cook county, be directed to expunge void orders entered by him in that court in the case of McDonough vs. First of Englewood Bond and Mortgage Corp. (No. 73400) in the county court of Cook county.

Mandamus will lie to expunge an order-entered by a court without jurisdiction. There is no force in the contention of the respondent that only a moot question remains since the receiver was discharged, without objection, by the order entered in the county court of Cook county on January 25, 1934. By the same order certain allowances were made to the receiver out of rents collected by him from petitioner’s real estate.

The question of the jurisdiction of a county court to appoint the county treasurer, who is ex-officio county collector, as receiver under “An act for the assessment of property and for the levy and collection of taxes,” approved March 30, 1872, as amended, (which amendment was approved on April 28, 1933, and is known as the Slcarda act,) was decided by us in McDonough v. Gage, (ante, p. 466.) What was there said is controlling here. For the reasons there stated the respondent was without jurisdiction to enter the orders appointing the receiver, and was also without jurisdiction to enter the orders approving his report or to make allowance of costs and charges out of the rents collected by him from the real estate of petitioner.

The prayer of the petition is therefore granted and the writ is awarded. The constitutional question raised need not be" considered.

writ awarded.

Stone, Orr and Herrick, JJ., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Town Court of Cicero v. Harrington
171 N.E.2d 647 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1961)
Herb v. Pitcairn
64 N.E.2d 519 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1945)
Johnson v. Richardson
266 N.W. 867 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 N.E. 419, 357 Ill. 475, 1934 Ill. LEXIS 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-first-of-englewood-bond-mortgage-corp-v-jarecki-ill-1934.