People ex rel. Fincher v. Paige

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Fincher v. Paige

51 A.D.2d 591, 378 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10891

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 591 (People ex rel. Fincher v. Paige) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Fincher v. Paige, 51 A.D.2d 591, 378 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, one entered July 29, 1975, and the other dated July 22, 1975, dismissed as academic, without costs. In the light of subsequent proceedings had before the Supreme Court, Westchester County, wherein the underlying [592]*592custody question was finally determined and the child directed to be returned to this State after the close of the fall semester, the orders under review, which stem from an alleged violation of a pendente lite order of visitation, have been rendered academic and are therefore dismissed as moot. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Hargett,. Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, one entered July 29, 1975, and the other dated July 22, 1975, dismissed as academic, without costs. In the light of subsequent proceedings had before the Supreme Court, Westchester County, wherein the underlying [592]*592custody question was finally determined and the child directed to be returned to this State after the close of the fall semester, the orders under review, which stem from an alleged violation of a pendente lite order of visitation, have been rendered academic and are therefore dismissed as moot. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Hargett,. Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 591, 378 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-fincher-v-paige-nyappdiv-1976.