People ex rel. Feldman v. Warden of New York City Correctional Institute for Women

331 N.E.2d 691, 36 N.Y.2d 846, 370 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1892
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[848]*848Memorandum. Since the finding of Special Term that relator willfully refused to comply with the court’s direction to produce the child in the custody proceeding, although she had the present ability to do so, was justified by the evidence, in view of the affirmance by the Appellate Division, and since there were no legal errors warranting reversal, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. Upon renewal of the application or upon further review (see Judiciary Law, § 774, subd 2), the hearing Justice in the prior proceedings who has acted unexceptionably under difficult circumstances may wish to refer such application to another Justice.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Cooke concur in memorandum; Judge Fuchs-berg taking no part.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Feldman v. Warden of New York City Correctional Institute for Women, 331 N.E.2d 691, 36 N.Y.2d 846, 370 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1892 (N.Y. 1975).

331 N.E.2d 691 (People ex rel. Feldman v. Warden of New York City Correctional Institute for Women) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

N. A. Development Co. v. Jones
114 Misc. 2d 896 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1982)
In re Renaldo Q.
83 Misc. 2d 945 (New York Family Court, 1975)