People ex rel. Farnum v. Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Farnum v. Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital

18 A.D.2d 1104, 239 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1104 (People ex rel. Farnum v. Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Farnum v. Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital, 18 A.D.2d 1104, 239 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 1, 196.1 and entered November 16, 1961, which failed to sustain the writ “ on the legal grounds requested ” and set the matter down for a hearing “ to determine whether the petitioner is presently competent to face trial.” Appeal dismissed. An intermediate order in a habeas corpus proceeding is not appealable (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1274; People ex rel. Duryee v. Duryee, 188 N. Y. 440; People ex rel. Wysocki v. Webster, 268 App. Div. 811; Matter of Schwartz v. Zimmerman, 275 App. Div. 852; People ex rel. Behar v. Behar, 8 A D 2d 958). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 1, 196.1 and entered November 16, 1961, which failed to sustain the writ “ on the legal grounds requested ” and set the matter down for a hearing “ to determine whether the petitioner is presently competent to face trial.” Appeal dismissed. An intermediate order in a habeas corpus proceeding is not appealable (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1274; People ex rel. Duryee v. Duryee, 188 N. Y. 440; People ex rel. Wysocki v. Webster, 268 App. Div. 811; Matter of Schwartz v. Zimmerman, 275 App. Div. 852; People ex rel. Behar v. Behar, 8 A D 2d 958). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1104, 239 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-farnum-v-superintendent-of-matteawan-state-hospital-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack