People ex rel. Farina v. District Court
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
[19] The sole issue raised in this original proceeding in the nature of prohibition is whether a defendant who waives a preliminary hearing in the county court and is bound over to the district court for trial may request and receive a subsequent preliminary hearing in the district court. See Crim. P. 5(c), 5(d), 7(b)(2), and 7(b)(3). This same issue was raised and decided in People ex rel. Farina v. District Court, 184 Colo. 406, 521 P.2d 778, which held that a valid waiver of the county court preliminary hearing operates as an admission by the defendant that sufficient evidence does exist to establish probable cause that the defendant committed the crimes charged. Our Rules of Criminal Procedure do not entitle a defendant to a preliminary hearing in the district court if he has previously waived a preliminary hearing in the county court. People ex rel. Farina v. District Court, supra.
Accordingly, the rule to show cause is made absolute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
521 P.2d 780 (People ex rel. Farina v. District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.