People ex rel. Faison v. Travis

277 A.D.2d 916, 715 N.Y.S.2d 672, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11591
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 277 A.D.2d 916 (People ex rel. Faison v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Faison v. Travis, 277 A.D.2d 916, 715 N.Y.S.2d 672, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. During the pendency of petitioner’s appeal to this Court, petitioner was released to parole supervision. Consequently, habeas corpus relief is no longer available, and this appeal has been rendered moot (see, People ex rel. Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 262 AD2d 433; see also, People ex rel. Campbell v Filion, 255 AD2d 915; People ex rel. Bressette v Superintendent, 175 AD2d 961, 962). This case does not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine because the issue whether petitioner’s parole hearing was untimely is “not of the type to remain live for a relatively short duration, thereby evading review” (Matter of Morrison v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 93 NY2d 834, 838; see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715). In any event, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition because petitioner “failed to take a timely administrative appeal following the final parole revocation hearing * * * and thus [petitioner] failed to exhaust his administrative remedies” (People ex rel. Campbell v Filion, supra, at 915; see, [917]*917People ex rel. Childs v Bennett, 231 AD2d 951, 952, lv denied 89 NY2d 802). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

REYNOLDS, LAMONT v. ARTUS, DALE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People ex rel. Ciccarelli v. Saxton
23 A.D.3d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People ex rel. Knoblauch v. Murray
298 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People ex rel. Morales v. Campbell
298 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. New York State Division of Parole
286 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 916, 715 N.Y.S.2d 672, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-faison-v-travis-nyappdiv-2000.