People Ex Rel. Elmira Advertiser Association v. . Gorman
This text of 119 N.E. 113 (People Ex Rel. Elmira Advertiser Association v. . Gorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application of relator for an alternative writ of mandamus having come on to be heard as a contested motion (Code Civ. Pro. § 2067, as amended by L. 1913, ch. 574), the Special Term in the exercise of its discretion denied the application. The Appellate Division, on appeal (Code Civ. Pro. § 2087, as amended by L. 1913, ch. 574), also in the exercise of discretion, affirmed the order denying, the application. The order *713 appealed from is not the object of review in this court. (People ex rel. Flynn v. Woods, 218 N. Y. 124-127.) The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.
Hiscock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 N.E. 113, 222 N.Y. 712, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-elmira-advertiser-association-v-gorman-ny-1918.