Home/New York Court of Appeals/People Ex Rel. Elmira Advertiser Association v. . Gorman

People Ex Rel. Elmira Advertiser Association v. . Gorman

119 N.E. 113, 222 N.Y. 712, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1601
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application of relator for an alternative writ of mandamus having come on to be heard as a contested motion (Code Civ. Pro. § 2067, as amended by L. 1913, ch. 574), the Special Term in the exercise of its discretion denied the application. The Appellate Division, on appeal (Code Civ. Pro. § 2087, as amended by L. 1913, ch. 574), also in the exercise of discretion, affirmed the order denying, the application. The order *713 appealed from is not the object of review in this court. (People ex rel. Flynn v. Woods, 218 N. Y. 124-127.) The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People Ex Rel. Elmira Advertiser Association v. . Gorman, 119 N.E. 113, 222 N.Y. 712, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1601 (N.Y. 1918).

119 N.E. 113 (People Ex Rel. Elmira Advertiser Association v. . Gorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ciccone v. Waterfront Commission
71 A.D.2d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society v. City of Syracuse
89 Misc. 2d 394 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
McLaughlin v. New York City Employees Retirement System
90 Misc. 2d 509 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)
Posner v. Levitt
37 A.D.2d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Botens v. Aronauer
66 Misc. 2d 5 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
Keen v. Mirabile
48 Misc. 2d 382 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Burdick v. Hall
232 A.D. 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)