People ex rel. Eisele v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad

270 Ill. 472
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided December 10, 1915·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

Mr. Justice Dunn

delivered the opinion of the court:

The Toledo, St. Louis and Western Railroad Company filed objections to the application of the collector of Madison county for a judgment and order of sale of its property for taxes. The court overruled the objections, and the railroad company has appealed from the judgment.

The taxes involved were the road and bridge taxes of the towns of Collinsville, New Douglas, Alhambra and Hamel. The objections were that the highway commissioners in those towns did not hold a regular semi-annual meeting between the first Tuesday in August and the first Tuesday in September for the purpose of determining the tax rate to be certified by them to the county board. These were valid objections, which, if sustained by the evidence, would prevent judgment for the taxes. (People v. Toledo, St. Louis and Western Railroad Co. 266 Ill. 112; People v. Toledo, St. Louis and Western Railroad Co. 267 id. 142.) The records of the highway commissioners in none of these townships showed any meeting of the commissioners between the first Tuesday in August and the first Tuesday in September at which any action was taken in regard to the road and bridge tax. The appellant contends that a record of the proceedings by the commissioners was required to be kept, and that the failure of the record to show the meeting required by law is proof that no such meeting was held. If the commissioners were required to keep a record of their proceedings there is no- doubt that their action could be proved by the record alone, and the failure of the record to show any action would be evidence that no such action was had. (People v. Madison County, 125 Ill. 334; City of Belleville v. Miller, 257 id. 244.) The case, therefore, turns upon the question whether a record was required to- be kept of the proceedings of the highway commissioners.

Prior to 1913 the Road and Bridge law provided that the town clerk should be ex-officio clerk of the board of highway commissioners, and should keep a record of all the official acts and proceedings of the board in a well-bound book to be provided for that purpose. In the revision of the Road and Bridge law in 1913 the provision expressly requiring the clerk to keep a record of all the official acts and proceedings of the board was omitted, though- it was still provided that the town clerk should act as the clerk of the board of highway commissioners of his town. (Hurd’s Stat. 1913, sec. 42, p. 2123.) By section 51 it was enacted that the clerk should have the custody of all records, books and papers of the town or road district and should file all certificates or oaths and other papers required by law to be filed in his office. Among other things he is required to record in the book of records of his district all orders and directions of the highway commissioners required by law to be kept and as thereinafter provided for. Section 80 provides for the filing and recording by the town clerk of all agreements for or releases of damages in the establishment, alteration, widening or vacating of roads. Sections 92 and 99 provide for recording final orders with reference to the establishment of roads. Section 121 is as follows: “The-commissioners shall keep a full and accurate record of all their proceedings under this act, .and shall, upon the completion of the road, file with the town or district clerk all records, papers, plans, plats, estimates, specifications and contracts, and shall make á full report to, and settlement with the board of town auditors or district clerk as provided in section 50 of this act. If the commissioners fail to malee such settlement, the supervisor or board of county commissioners shall cause an action to be instituted against them in the corporate name of the township or road district to enforce such settlement.’-’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Eisele v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad, 270 Ill. 472 (Ill. 1915).

270 Ill. 472 (People ex rel. Eisele v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mosman v. Mathison
408 P.2d 450 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1965)
People Ex Rel. Toman v. Chicago Heights Terminal Transfer Railroad
32 N.E.2d 161 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1941)
Otey v. Westerman
276 Ill. App. 395 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1934)
Selby v. Village of Winfield
255 Ill. App. 67 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1929)
People ex rel. Gauss v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
273 Ill. 110 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1916)
People ex rel. Jourdan v. Illinois Central Railroad
272 Ill. 116 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1916)