People ex rel. Eidenmueller v. Follette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Eidenmueller v. Follette

27 A.D.2d 738, 279 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4927

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 738 (People ex rel. Eidenmueller v. Follette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Eidenmueller v. Follette, 27 A.D.2d 738, 279 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant to amend the remittitur on his appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered May 2, 1963, which judgment was unanimously affirmed by order of this court, dated October 24, 1966. Motion granted. Decision of this court dated October 24, 1966 [26 A D 2d 833], amended by including, as part of the decretal paragraph, a statement to the effect that appellant raised certain constitutional questions on the appeal with respect to his having been denied the protection of the Fourteenth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and section 2 of article I of the New York State Constitution; and the construction of said Constitutions was directly involved; and order, also dated October 24, 1966, amended accordingly. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant to amend the remittitur on his appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered May 2, 1963, which judgment was unanimously affirmed by order of this court, dated October 24, 1966. Motion granted. Decision of this court dated October 24, 1966 [26 A D 2d 833], amended by including, as part of the decretal paragraph, a statement to the effect that appellant raised certain constitutional questions on the appeal with respect to his having been denied the protection of the Fourteenth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and section 2 of article I of the New York State Constitution; and the construction of said Constitutions was directly involved; and order, also dated October 24, 1966, amended accordingly. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 738, 279 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-eidenmueller-v-follette-nyappdiv-1967.