People ex rel. Eckerson v. Zundel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Eckerson v. Zundel

54 N.Y.S. 1112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 54 N.Y.S. 1112 (People ex rel. Eckerson v. Zundel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Eckerson v. Zundel, 54 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defects for which the amendment granted by the special term permits the tax roll to be assailed, if it exists, renders the assessments void on their face, and under the authority of People v. Parker, 117 N. Y. 86, 22 N. E. 752, a certiorari, under the law of 1880, should not issue to relieve from such an error. Order reversed, with $10 costs in one case, and disbursements in all, and motion denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defects for which the amendment granted by the special term permits the tax roll to be assailed, if it exists, renders the assessments void on their face, and under the authority of People v. Parker, 117 N. Y. 86, 22 N. E. 752, a certiorari, under the law of 1880, should not issue to relieve from such an error. Order reversed, with $10 costs in one case, and disbursements in all, and motion denied, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-eckerson-v-zundel-nyappdiv-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack