People ex rel. Earwicker v. Dillon
57 N.Y.S. 1144
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People ex rel. Earwicker v. Dillon. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 A.D. 539 →
Opinion
Under section 2086, Code Civ. Proc., the amount of costs is in the discretion of the court. Considering that the question involved is entirely a new one, and that doubt may be entertained as to the duty of the respondents in the premises, we think the costs allowed by our order are sufficient. Motion denied. See 56 N. Y. Supp. 416.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Earwicker v. Dillon, 57 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).
57 N.Y.S. 1144 (People ex rel. Earwicker v. Dillon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Earwicker v. Dillon
56 N.Y.S. 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)