People ex rel. Dyckman v. Trustees of Brooklyn

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

People ex rel. Dyckman v. Trustees of Brooklyn

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 24

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 24 (People ex rel. Dyckman v. Trustees of Brooklyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Dyckman v. Trustees of Brooklyn, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 24 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court of Errors, accordingly dismissed the writ of error, holding, that a writ of error does not lie upon the refusal of the Supreme Court to grant a peremptory mandamus, when application is made on motion:—that it lies only for the relator when judgment is pronounced after issue, joined upon plea or demurrer, interposed upon the coming in of the return to the alternative mandamus ; and the writ of error was accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Errors, accordingly dismissed the writ of error, holding, that a writ of error does not lie upon the refusal of the Supreme Court to grant a peremptory mandamus, when application is made on motion:—that it lies only for the relator when judgment is pronounced after issue, joined upon plea or demurrer, interposed upon the coming in of the return to the alternative mandamus ; and the writ of error was accordingly dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-dyckman-v-trustees-of-brooklyn-nycterr-1799.