People ex rel. Dutcher v. New York State Board of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Dutcher v. New York State Board of Parole

71 A.D.2d 963, 419 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13218

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 27, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 A.D.2d 963 (People ex rel. Dutcher v. New York State Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Dutcher v. New York State Board of Parole, 71 A.D.2d 963, 419 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 5, 1978, which upon reargument of a judgment entered September 1, 1978, sustained the writ and ordered petitioner’s release. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements and proceeding dismissed. Petitioner’s rights are governed by the provisions of section 259-m of the Executive Law. Pursuant to the provisions of that section and section 259-i (subd 3, par [f], cl [i]) of the Executive Law, petitioner’s revocation hearing was timely held. O’Connor, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 5, 1978, which upon reargument of a judgment entered September 1, 1978, sustained the writ and ordered petitioner’s release. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements and proceeding dismissed. Petitioner’s rights are governed by the provisions of section 259-m of the Executive Law. Pursuant to the provisions of that section and section 259-i (subd 3, par [f], cl [i]) of the Executive Law, petitioner’s revocation hearing was timely held. O’Connor, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 963, 419 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-dutcher-v-new-york-state-board-of-parole-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack