People ex rel. Duncan v. Needles

3 Ill. 361
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1840
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ill. 361 (People ex rel. Duncan v. Needles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Duncan v. Needles, 3 Ill. 361 (Ill. 1840).

Opinion

In this case it was held, that where a sheriff or other officer neglects or fails to return a fee bill, execution, or other process, the practice is, in the first instance, to take a rule against him to return the same ; and that it is irregular to issue a rule, in the first instance, to show cause why an attachment should not issue.

Held, also, that an affidavit of the relator, setting forth, that he transmitted to James B. Needles, late sheriff of Monroe county, for collection,” the fee bills and executions, was sufficient evidence of their having come to the hands of the defendant, upon a motion for a rule against him, to return the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ill. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-duncan-v-needles-ill-1840.