People ex rel. Duke v. Wilson

251 A.D. 914

This text of 251 A.D. 914 (People ex rel. Duke v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Duke v. Wilson, 251 A.D. 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Appeal from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus and remanding the prisoner. The relator is confined at Great Meadow Prison under a sentence, the minimum of which was ten years, and the maximum life, upon conviction of robbery in the first degree. On July 20, 1936, the Governor reduced the minimum of relator’s sentence so that it would expire on August 19, 1936, “ in order that he may apply to the Board of Parole for State Prisons for parole.” The relator was brought before the Parole Board, his case was considered, and parole was denied. In his brief the relator states that his petition and writ “ do not seek a parole but demand that the Warden release him;” that the Board of Parole can have no jurisdiction of his case until after the warden has actually released him and placed him outside of the prison walls. Order dismissing writ and remanding prisoner unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-duke-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1937.