People ex rel. Duamutef v. Dalsheim

211 A.D.2d 835, 622 N.Y.S.2d 83

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated April 23, 1993, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A habeas corpus proceeding is not proper in the present case because even if the petitioner’s claims were meritorious, the only remedy would be a new trial, not immediate release from prison (see, People ex. rel. Fisher v Leonardo, 200 AD2d 844). Therefore, the application was properly denied. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Duamutef v. Dalsheim, 211 A.D.2d 835, 622 N.Y.S.2d 83 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

211 A.D.2d 835 (People ex rel. Duamutef v. Dalsheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Fisher v. Leonardo
200 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)