People ex rel. Duamutef v. Dalsheim
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated April 23, 1993, which denied the application.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A habeas corpus proceeding is not proper in the present case because even if the petitioner’s claims were meritorious, the only remedy would be a new trial, not immediate release from prison (see, People ex. rel. Fisher v Leonardo, 200 AD2d 844). Therefore, the application was properly denied. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
211 A.D.2d 835 (People ex rel. Duamutef v. Dalsheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.