People ex rel. Douglas v. Van Nostrand

New York Supreme Court

People ex rel. Douglas v. Van Nostrand

33 N.Y.S. 1132, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 872

New York Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1895·Published

Opinion

DYICMAN, J.

This is an appeal from the final order in proceedings to review the action of the assessors of the town of Flushing, in ■Queens county, under the statute of 1880. We had a similar proceeding by the same relator against the same defendant in relation to this same property before us at the July term in 1893. 71 Hun, 611, 24 N. Y. Supp. 513. The property was then assessed for $60,000, the same as now, and the proof of value, both actual and relative, was substantially the same as now. Such being the case, we are bound by our former decision, and the order should be affirmed, with costs. BROWN, P. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYICMAN, J.

This is an appeal from the final order in proceedings to review the action of the assessors of the town of Flushing, in ■Queens county, under the statute of 1880. We had a similar proceeding by the same relator against the same defendant in relation to this same property before us at the July term in 1893. 71 Hun, 611, 24 N. Y. Supp. 513. The property was then assessed for $60,000, the same as now, and the proof of value, both actual and relative, was substantially the same as now. Such being the case, we are bound by our former decision, and the order should be affirmed, with costs. BROWN, P. J., not sitting.

People ex rel. Douglas v. Van Nostrand, 33 N.Y.S. 1132, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 872 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

33 N.Y.S. 1132 (People ex rel. Douglas v. Van Nostrand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related