People ex rel. Dougherty v. Wurster

New York Supreme Court

People ex rel. Dougherty v. Wurster

35 N.Y.S. 88, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 604, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 445, 89 Hun 604

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 26, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 N.Y.S. 88 (People ex rel. Dougherty v. Wurster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Dougherty v. Wurster, 35 N.Y.S. 88, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 604, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 445, 89 Hun 604 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PRATT, J.

Relator cannot be properly said to be a member of the force for extinguishing fires, but was employed, as his appointment shows, as a laborer. Taking the case of People v. Fire Com’rs, 28 Hun, 495, as the true interpretation of the law, the relator cannot be said to be a member of the fire force, but comes under the designation of those who can be removed with charge and a trial.

Writ quashed. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATT, J.

Relator cannot be properly said to be a member of the force for extinguishing fires, but was employed, as his appointment shows, as a laborer. Taking the case of People v. Fire Com’rs, 28 Hun, 495, as the true interpretation of the law, the relator cannot be said to be a member of the fire force, but comes under the designation of those who can be removed with charge and a trial.

Writ quashed. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 N.Y.S. 88, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 604, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 445, 89 Hun 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-dougherty-v-wurster-nysupct-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack