People ex rel. Dougherty v. Wurster

35 N.Y.S. 88, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 604, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 445, 89 Hun 604
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PRATT, J.

Relator cannot be properly said to be a member of the force for extinguishing fires, but was employed, as his appointment shows, as a laborer. Taking the case of People v. Fire Com’rs, 28 Hun, 495, as the true interpretation of the law, the relator cannot be said to be a member of the fire force, but comes under the designation of those who can be removed with charge and a trial.

Writ quashed. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Dougherty v. Wurster, 35 N.Y.S. 88, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 604, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 445, 89 Hun 604 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

35 N.Y.S. 88 (People ex rel. Dougherty v. Wurster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osgoodby v. Talmadge
45 F.2d 696 (Second Circuit, 1930)