People ex rel. Doty v. Krueger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Doty v. Krueger

32 A.D.2d 845, 302 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3561

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1969·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Hassau County, entered December 18, 1968, which dismissed the writ. Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of the learned Justice at Special Term. We agree that proceedings concerning sodomy and sexual abuse, each in the first degree, committed between members of the same household, are not transferable to the Family Court pursuant to section 812 of the Family Court Act. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hopkins, Munder and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [58 Misc 2d 428.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Hassau County, entered December 18, 1968, which dismissed the writ. Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of the learned Justice at Special Term. We agree that proceedings concerning sodomy and sexual abuse, each in the first degree, committed between members of the same household, are not transferable to the Family Court pursuant to section 812 of the Family Court Act. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hopkins, Munder and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [58 Misc 2d 428.]

People ex rel. Doty v. Krueger, 32 A.D.2d 845, 302 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

32 A.D.2d 845 (People ex rel. Doty v. Krueger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related