People ex rel. Dooner v. Buckman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Dooner v. Buckman

29 A.D.2d 560, 286 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2693

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 560 (People ex rel. Dooner v. Buckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Dooner v. Buckman, 29 A.D.2d 560, 286 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January [561]*56127, 1967, modified, on the law and the facts, by adding to the first decretal paragraph, after the provision that the writ of habeas corpus “is dismissed ”, the words “ without prejudice to the commencement of another proceeding upon notice to relator’s committee.” As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the foregoing modification is warranted by the hearing Justice’s ruling, noted in the stenographer’s minutes, that the dismissal of the writ was without prejudice to the commencement of another proceeding when relator was prepared to "go ahead properly, with notice to the committee. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January [561]*56127, 1967, modified, on the law and the facts, by adding to the first decretal paragraph, after the provision that the writ of habeas corpus “is dismissed ”, the words “ without prejudice to the commencement of another proceeding upon notice to relator’s committee.” As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the foregoing modification is warranted by the hearing Justice’s ruling, noted in the stenographer’s minutes, that the dismissal of the writ was without prejudice to the commencement of another proceeding when relator was prepared to "go ahead properly, with notice to the committee. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 560, 286 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-dooner-v-buckman-nyappdiv-1967.