People ex rel. Dole v. Town Board of Hamburg

58 Misc. 643, 109 N.Y.S. 913
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 58 Misc. 643 (People ex rel. Dole v. Town Board of Hamburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Dole v. Town Board of Hamburg, 58 Misc. 643, 109 N.Y.S. 913 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

Opinion

White, J.

The relator is the owner and occupant of premises situated in the town of Hamburg. His dwelling-house on said premises fronted on Clark street, a public highway, which is crossed by the Buffalo and Susquehanna Railway Company. By order of the State Board of Railroad Commissioners Clark street was elevated to enable the railroad to cross under it, which it does. This crossing made in that manner substantially impaired the right of access t-o the street as theretofore enjoyed by the relator. He made a claim for damages against both the town and the railroad and both repudiated it. He then requested the-town to institute proceedings to condemn the easement thus affected, and it declined to do that.

[644]*644No adjudication in this State has been referred to by counsel, nor do I know of any, which is decisive of the question involved in this motion. The views of - Judge Haight, in that part of his opinion construing section 63 of the Railroad Law, in the case of Smith v. Boston & Albany Railroad Company, 181 N. Y. 132-140, which was concurred in hy Judges Bartlett and Vann, to my mind accords with justice. I am clearly of the opinion that the claim of the relator on the merits is a valid one under section 63 of the Railroad Law, and that he is invoking the proper remedy for its enforcement.

Motion granted, with fifty dollars costs to the relator.

Motion granted, with fifty dollars costs to relator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. New York Central Railroad
255 A.D. 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
West 158th Street Garage Corp. v. State
168 Misc. 822 (New York State Court of Claims, 1938)
People ex rel. Mott Wheel Works v. Hayes
178 A.D. 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
People ex rel. Dawson v. Duffey
177 A.D. 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
People ex rel. Dole v. Town Board of Hamburg
111 N.Y.S. 1135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Misc. 643, 109 N.Y.S. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-dole-v-town-board-of-hamburg-nysupct-1908.