Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People ex rel. Didio v. Schriro

People ex rel. Didio v. Schriro

88 A.D.3d 824, 930 N.Y.2d 889
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.3d 824 (People ex rel. Didio v. Schriro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Didio v. Schriro, 88 A.D.3d 824, 930 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[825]*825The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Dickerson and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 824, 930 N.Y.2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-didio-v-schriro-nyappdiv-2011.