People ex rel. Detroit & Howell R. R. v. Township Board
This text of 19 Mich. 11 (People ex rel. Detroit & Howell R. R. v. Township Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Practice in the Supreme Court: Notice of argument. Mandamus cases, at a term sub sequent to the commencement of proceedings, are calendar causes, to which, the rules requiring notice of argument and printing of briefs apply.
In this case, an order to show cause was made returnable on a day in the last term. The return was made during vacation. The cause was not placed upon the docket at this term.
The respondent being ready for argument, the Court held that the cause must be considered as a calendar cause, which must be regularly noticed and placed upon the docket; and that the record and briefs must be printed, as in other cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Mich. 11, 1869 Mich. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-detroit-howell-r-r-v-township-board-mich-1869.