People ex rel. Derrick v. Somers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Derrick v. Somers

187 A.D. 968

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1919·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Raymond v. Clement (118 App. Div. 528; affd., 194 N. Y. 560). All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that there must be a substantial compliance with [969] the statute* to make an effective vote; and it appearing that the statute was not complied with, as has been adjudicated in the proceeding to which the Commissioner was a party [See Matter of Kline, 185 App. Div. 945], are of opinion that the action of the Commissioner in refusing the certificate was unwarranted.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Raymond v. Clement (118 App. Div. 528; affd., 194 N. Y. 560). All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that there must be a substantial compliance with [969] the statute* to make an effective vote; and it appearing that the statute was not complied with, as has been adjudicated in the proceeding to which the Commissioner was a party [See Matter of Kline, 185 App. Div. 945], are of opinion that the action of the Commissioner in refusing the certificate was unwarranted.

Footnotes

People ex rel. Derrick v. Somers, 187 A.D. 968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

187 A.D. 968 (People ex rel. Derrick v. Somers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related