People ex rel. Delbridge v. Green
29 Mich. 121, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 54
Opinion
held, that even if mandamus can be resorted to at all for such "’a purpose, the application should come from the proper public officer, which in this court is the attorney general; and that the relator had not made such, a showing of special interest in the matter as authorized him to petition in his own behalf, or of efforts to procure the proper public officer to proceed, such as would authorize him to intervene in behalf of the public.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Delbridge v. Green, 29 Mich. 121, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 54 (Mich. 1874).
29 Mich. 121 (People ex rel. Delbridge v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Toan v. McGinn
260 N.W. 108 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
Johnson v. Gibson
215 N.W. 333 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1927)
W.D. Yett, Mayor v. Cook
281 S.W. 837 (Texas Supreme Court, 1926)
Home Telephone Co. v. Michigan Railroad Commission
140 N.W. 496 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1913)
Sweet v. Smith
117 N.W. 59 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Brophy v. Schindler
85 N.W. 1114 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Smith v. Mayor of Saginaw
81 Mich. 123 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)
State ex rel. Bamford v. Hollinshead
2 A. 244 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1885)
Territory ex rel. Graves v. Cole
3 Dakota 301 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1884)